Sunday, December 6, 2020

The rant

 




We are in December, almost a year since the pandemic has started and many lives affected. Something that has not been different from last December at this time, is Real Madrid (RM) football. In fact has actually gotten worse if not stayed the same. It has been a while since I wrote something here and wanted to use this opportunity to talk about what has been literally frustrating for me as a fan. So, this post will be very football focused.

 

Let's start at the beginning for me, the beginning was when Zinedine Zidane (ZZ) resigned on May 31st 2018. A series of events forced him out and among those that I have identified myself without being part of these conversations and based on articles and observations are:

·        The squad had run its course and could not get higher than they had been: Champions league repeat which has never been done in the modern era of football

·        Florentino Perez's refusal to sell Bale and keep Cristiano Ronaldo

·        The refusal of the board to provide players needed to inject the new blood in the team for it to continue to be competitive.

 

For those who are fans, you already know what then unfolded: a series of poor performances and humiliations that were not worthy of this club. But in the midst of all that, ZZ came back, he came back less than a year after leaving, on March 11th 2019. The reasons he came back are numerous, amongst them, his eternal love for the Merengues. There were demands that he made on coming back, the most important ones: the signing of key players namely Hazard, Pogba and Mbappe. He only has gotten Hazard out of the 3 and the board, and Florentino at the helm, has literally not delivered and the justification they give is simple. The goal of the board is to get Real Madrid healthy financially while making upgrades to the stadium, so the influx of new talents has been literally stopped for 3 years (if we go back as far as the ban received from FIFA for signing under-age players). The focus has been in looking for the newest un-polished talent around the world, mainly in Brazil (as Florentino has had an obsession with Brazilians since the club missed on signing Neymar). They have developed one of if not the biggest network of scouts that scrapes the face of the earth to find the new shiny young talents that they intend to develop through Castilla or via loans. The idea is for them to become great and contribute to the first team right away or be sold to bring some money to club coffers. But a key element of this plan has completely been ignored whether willfully or not: the expectation that RM has to win; and win no matter what is going on as fans expect the team to perform. Or at least try and show commitment to win which they did by winning the last season, thanks to the virus as it allowed the team to rest and focus on the last 11 games. So why is RM struggling, below I will try to provide my personal thoughts/analysis on the reasons.

 

·        The roster

This team has been needing some fresh blood for a while; fresh blood in the sense of getting experienced players that could directly contribute, not via teenagers as they have done. These kids cannot be expected to perform and deliver for what is the pinnacle of football. This club has crazy demands, each game is a final and is treated as such by the fans and what have we seen? Half of our legendary back line is on the wrong side of 30 with only one still carrying the team in Ramos while Marcelo has been a shell of his former self. It is sad for me to see him performing so poorly and he should have left 2 years ago and the time of Lopetegui and Solari proved that he was not at the level. This begs the question of the players we developed and sold. The case of  Reguilon first who could have been of such help for this team right now,  especially due to the tactical setup that requires the full backs to provide the width and are the main providers of crosses in the area. There is also the poor level of performance of the other half, we have Varane who have been in RM for 10 years but cannot for his own sake perform as an insurance in this backline whether with Ramos or anyone else, he is so inconsistent that I wonder what exactly he learned playing alongside Ramos and Pepe (who for me was the best pair of central defenders that I have personally witnessed. Even better than the Vidic-Ferdinand of Man United pairing and the Nesta-Cannavaro of Italy). We signed Militao who has been very poor and also has not been given enough chances to perform, he does look like a bust so out of the list of central defenders only Nacho is playing at a very good level. On the right side, Carvajal has slowly recovered his form after his heart issues but cannot stay fit for a month, his natural substitute in Odriozola has been so poor and lacked so much confidence that he was sent on loan to Bayern for half a season last year. We have had Lucas Vasquez a natural winger who had to deputize there and has been our best and most consistent full-back.

 

The midfield is another area where the roster has not been provided with what is needed, there is no back-up for the only defensive mid we have in Casemiro. We know that Ødegaard was recalled from his loan with La Real Sociedad but has not been playing much as we all expected. Modric is 35 years old and still a very good mid but he is 35!. Kroos has been the same old but he needs better pairing around him for his contribution to provide even more offensively. Players such as Isco are not at the level required to be in RM anymore and that has been the case for 2 years at least, loaning Ceballos, selling Llorente are decisions that are haunting us now. There is absolutely no depth in midfield where the only player who has developed and become a key contributor is Fede Valverde. A team of this caliber cannot have such thin options that are not even diverse in its roaster.

 

The attack is by far the area that needs the most improvements, we have Karim Benzema (KB9) that is the only consistent contributor. Then we have teenagers who have not had a full professional season where they've played consistently in Vinicius and Rodrygo on whose shoulders the whole weight of the madridismo's expectations are placed. We also have Jovic who barely featured somehow even though 60 millions euros were spent on him and the ghost of Asensio who has peaked at 24 years of age and is just not adding anything to the team when he plays.

 

·        The coach- the tactic

The great RM of 2014-2018 was the result of heavy investments in the team and tactical setups from Jose Mourinho mainly but also Ancelotti then Zidane. But Zidane and Ancelotti before him inherited ready made teams that were seasoned and knew how to play and were hungry to win. The key of that roaster was the attacking trident and the full backs. We had true right wingers in Di Maria and Bale, a machine on the left wing in Cristiano (CR7) and the best 9.5 in the world (who is truly a 10) in Benzema. KB9 allowed this team to be lethal in a 4-3-3 set-up as he will always drop in half-spaces between attack and midfield, therefore dragging at least one central defender with him, which created space for CR7 and Bale to run-in behind. Besides that, the actual wingers of the team were Marcelo and Carvajal, on left and right, respectively. We had Casemiro dropping down to form a line of 3 defenders on offensive phases and Kroos & Modric in midfield controlling the tempo. There were iterations of this system that could morph into a 4-4-2 when introducing Isco or James for one of the wingers, this allowed more control in midfield. There was flexibility in this team.

The issue now is the team is more or less being setup by ZZ to play the same way with a high press while we do not have the players to execute this approach at all right now, especially in attack. The logic suggests that a change of approach should be made first because of the roaster. We now have Mendy (who is super average offensively) for Marcelo, we have Vinicius whose brain is faster than his legs, no true right wing that offers verticality (to push the opponent's back line further down) and KB9 who is still dropping in the space while the players around him have no understanding of what they have to do.

 

All of these things are the responsibility of the coach as he has shown a clear incapacity to find the best formula to make it work with this roaster. True, he did not get new reinforcements but he is responsible for allowing some players to leave and flourish elsewhere while we are in need of players with their profiles. This is just ridiculous that this team has resorted to play to not lose and count on luck for goals. Something needs to change because the writing is on the wall about a real disaster this year, besides the fact that I'm 90% convinced there will be no silverware this year. The pragmatic approach of the previous season worked but this is not going to cut it this year; he has to find a way to make things work with what he has at his disposal and not force a system that is clearly not appropriate for the squad. Anyone observing with a keen eye can see that.

 

·        The president- the board

I never thought I would be saying this about RM's board, but they are the victims of their own success and since they raised the bar that high, I will be using that high bar to judge. From his first stint as president, Florentino Perez has made us used to having marquee signings, splashing millions across Europe to assemble all star teams that had comparatively subpar results on the field but masterstroke financially. This man is a billionaire and at the top of one of the biggest construction conglomerate in the world, so he is not an idiot. We all know that, judging by the last financial results of RM published last week where we can see that the team is sound financially with absolutely no debt, which is great but it begs the question, do all these results have to directly affect the performances on the field? Let me rephrase this, is there a correlation between success on the field and financial performances? The easy answer will be a resounding "Yes" but in fact it is not the case in reality. Good example, the Dallas Cowboys of the NFL have not won a super Bowl since 1996 I believe but they have been valuating at an increase every year since and are one of the most successful sports franchises in the world. Francisco Perez-Cutino (2008) said, in his unpublished MBA thesis at Judge Business School in Cambridge:

 

"But contrary to the common idea that good [on field] performance will drive good financials,

There is evidence that better revenue-generating structures can have a significant impact in the performance of the team… only with good financial results clubs can buy and retain good players and create good teams."

 

A team should be developing sustainable economic-sport models to make profits to buy and retain better players, which leads to better results. Another study from the book Winners and Losers: The Business Strategy of Football (1999) by Stefan Szymanski and Tim Kuypers details this extensively. So my point is I know that a well rounded structure for marketing and generating revenues has been implemented in RM. We have a very good business savvy guy as president and also Jose Angel Sanchez who use to be CEO for SEGA southern Europe before joining RM in 2000 with Florentino. This makes it worse when you place their record in managing the finances with what they have provided managers in terms of players over the last 4 years. It is borderline professional negligence, to think we could lose CR7 and without investment still be/stay competitive on all fronts and for me they carry the brunt of the responsibility of the miserable display the team is providing week in and week out for the last 2.5 years. The obsession of not having debt which I support should not come at the expense of the team's performance and investments need to be made to get the rewards. Even if there are no true correlations between the two, one cannot be sustained or efficient without the other. Funny enough, what was Florentino biggest criticism (splashing money all the time for big players) has become his handicap as he refuses to indulge in such endeavors for his second stint as president. The real issue for me is the lack of sporting strategy, hence the need for a Sporting Director that can align his vision with whoever is the coach, this will impact players that are signed and how to incorporate them. I cannot believe my beloved RM has become so reactive and weak in terms of transfers.

 

Quick addition: I see RM might be missing on M'Bappe, if this is the case I will not surprised to see fans asking the board to step down because that will be utter incompetence if we are missing on all the stars that are supposed to be part of the long term plan when the renovated stadium is open. This will be their fault as they uncharacteristically built their whole strategy on just one player that they did not even sign. As Alice Morse Earle once said

“Yesterday is history. Tomorrow is a mystery. Today is a gift. That is why it is called the present.”

 

Hala Madrid!

 

 

 

 

References

 

Mandis, Steven G. “Real Madrid's on and off-Field Dominance.” Essay. In The Real Madrid Way, First Ed. DALLAS, TX: BENBELLA BOOKS, 2016.

 

Szymanski, S., & Kuypers, T. (2000). Winners and losers.

 

Perez-Cutino, F. (2008). Innovative approaches to increase revenues for football clubs. Can good business sense make football better?

 

Friday, July 31, 2020

Hala Madra! Y Nada Mas

On July 16th 2020, Real Madrid became Spanish champion for the 34th time. What a season it was; starting with a string of bad results associated with poor performances, the team finally found its way with a renewed focus on defense and solidity and grinding out results. That was the key for this team that lost their serial scorer, CR7, and since then have struggled to be a real contender in all the competitions they played.

 

In my first ever post, I mentioned that I was a fan of  Real Madrid  and shared that I would be writing about it in a future post. Today, I wanted to shed a little light on what it is to be a Real Madrid fan from my view point.

 

Anyone who is interested in Real Madrid will first find out about "The Real Madrid Way" as is beautifully translated in a book of the same name by Steven G. Mandis. A book that provides amazing insight on the club, what it stands for and above all what has made it the most successful and even most valuable sports franchise in the world.

 

All the fans belong to this community known as the "Madridismo" and this sense of belonging has been instilled in me since that game on May 20th 1998. I did my homework and researched the club and since we are in a middle of one of the greatest eras of the club under the presidency of Florentino Perez I wanted to give some insights about the club. As mentioned above, the key to Real Madrid Fanhood is the core of values. "Management truly believes that the path to success has to be made through the values and culture attached to them. This culture has yielded success on the field and by so have created a profitable and sustainable enterprise that people can identify and refer to, embracing it as a meaningful and steadfast cornerstone of their own personal value and identity" (Mandis, 2016). This statement provides a clear and accurate description of how every fan should feel or aspire to feel about this club.

 

Now, what are these values that Florentino Perez, the current president, defined based on survey responses from Madridistas (fans)? I have them enumerated below, but first he also wrote a mission statement that is worth mentioning here:

 

Mission: to be an open and multicultural club that is both appreciated and respected throughout the world both for its sporting success and for the values it disseminates, which, based on the search for excellence both on and off the field of play, contribute toward fulfilling the expectations of its members and followers.

 

WILL TO WIN

 

SPORTMANSHIP

 

EXCELLENCE & QUALITY

 

TEAM PHILOSOPHY

 

TRAINING

 

SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

 

ECONOMIC RESPONSIBILITY

 

These are the values that I really wasn't aware of when starting my journey as a fan. They fall into what I have seen from the club's way of handling things throughout the years. Most recently, we saw Real Madrid offer their stadium, Santiago Bernabeu, as a warehouse for COVID-19 materials for the community of Madrid. We saw the players accepting pay cuts so that other employees could keep their jobs and keep on getting paid, and additional cuts are happening for the rest of the year. The first team players have been offering their cooperation and understanding to help the club via the leadership of the captain, Sergio Ramos. Should we also talk about Santiago Canizares (former Real Madrid player) who had an event for his foundation cancelled from happening on FC Valencia facilities after he criticized the management of the club? And then when Real Madrid offered him its facilities to host the event on short notice? Real Madrid remembered him as one of their own. This is what this team stands for.

 

As for me, I become an official Madridista Supporter in June 2017. I am actually supporter #903262 - official socio membership has been halted due to the high demand and a policy of only admitting descendants of present socios as new socios was established in June 2011. What this basically means is that no new voting member (socio) can be added to the 92,000 current members except when the rule above applies and due to the very high demand the "Madridista Supporter" system was implemented to still allow fans to contribute (by their memberships) and also to receive some perks for being a member. Unlike most professional sports teams that are owned by billionaires or corporations, Real Madrid has been owned by the socios.

 

Now you know a little bit of Real Madrid, now I leave you with our rally cry "Hala Madrid!!" and a verse from the Real Madrid anthem also titled Hala Madrid.

 

 

🎶

Hala Madrid and Nothing More

 

History that you made

History to make

Because nobody resists

Your desire to win

The stars are coming out

My old Chamartín

From far and near

                                                                   You bring us here                                                             🎶

 

 

References

 

Mandis, Steven G. “Real Madrid's on and off-Field Dominance.” Essay. In The Real Madrid Way, First Ed. DALLAS, TX: BENBELLA BOOKS, 2016.


Saturday, June 20, 2020

The belief

Let's talk about what it is to live in this world through the lenses of Alain Souchon and his famous song: "Foule Sentimental" which directly translates to Sentimental Crowd. He is a famous French singer and songwriter who is able to ally philosophy and relativism in the way he writes. I will use the song as the basis for the post today.

 

A belief is one of the many psychological attitudes a person may have toward a proposition which, as we all more or less know or agree, is a content that represents a certain state of affairs. Good example:

 

(a) Cows are herbivores

 

Anybody who believes this statement has the psychological attitude of accepting that cows are herbivores. The person takes that content to be the case. Under normal circumstances, if asked whether the above statement (a) is true, she would assent. Assuming she's sincere and competent, she would voice her belief by stating (a). She could actually possibly state:

 

(b) "It is true that cows are herbivores"

(c) "It is the case that cows are herbivores"

 

That person might in fact use many other statements or sentences that are logically equivalent to these statements.

 

In any case what I am trying to get at is what this world offers to us, the world we live in. In his song Souchon states that this world offers us so many things that:

 

We are made to believe

That happiness is to have

Our wardrobes full of assets

In scorn of us, [it's] pathetic because

 

Sentimental crowd that we are

We are pining for ideals

Attracted to the stars, to sails

[To] only non-commercial things

Sentimental crowd that we are

 

Souchon makes this statement based on his own analysis of the world we live in. This statement is made based on examples he cites throughout the song. The key element for me here is the fact that he calls all of us a "Sentimental Crowd", should we consider this a fact or a belief? From the definition stated above we know that whether we hold a belief, disbelief, or nonbelief toward a proposition, thinking logically can help in developing the attitude that would be most adequate. This is important, since our beliefs are the building blocks of our reasoning.

 

For me, I believe in this statement, in light of recent events across the globe all of us can see that the exasperation of people's feelings have enhanced the sentiment of inequality that many of us have been feeling for years to become a well shared feeling. We are indeed a "Sentimental crowd".

 

The next level of the belief hinges on its accuracy and truth. An acceptable degree of accuracy requires the belief to represent or get close to representing the facts.

 

We live in the world of high consumption; the more we own, the better we feel about ourselves, and the more we get, the more we want. For me, Souchon is absolutely right in his depiction of human kind, especially when he describes the ideals as being non-commercial things, at least for me. I mentioned above that accuracy has a lot to do with degree as it depends on the contents of beliefs, and some contents are closer to representing the facts than others. Some beliefs are thus more accurate than others, but from my previous post ("The numbers") we also know that statistical syllogism and matter of fact statements need the right context and facts to be considered true.

 

In the reality of things we can accept that truth and falsity do not depend on degree at all. A belief can be true or false simply because we cannot say that a belief is more or less true. A belief cannot be partially true otherwise it is not a belief on the other end the same belief can hold the virtues of accuracy and truth at the same time.

 

The belief of Alain Souchon in his song for example can be both accurate and true, accurate because based on the description he provides and the depiction attached to it.

The virtues of accuracy and truth can be lacking for a belief and still that belief can be reasonable. A belief is reasonable if and only if it is well supported , otherwise it is deemed unreasonable. Since beliefs of different types can be supported differently. In other words, what's required for a belief to be reasonable varies according to what sort of belief it is. In Alain Souchon song, his belief can be described as empirical (or observational) and what is required for his belief to be reasonable differs from what will be required by non observational beliefs to be reasonable.

 

Many philosophers have provided remarks on each case, in essence they say that a conceptual belief is reasonable if and only if its content is such that to understand it is to realize that it is true. Such beliefs are those that go without saying to anyone who understands their contents such as a "sister is a female sibling" for example.

 

The empirical beliefs have to be supported either by evidence or by inference from evidence. We use evidence and inference as the ways to establish reasonableness and when it lacks either of these two aspects, they could be said to have instead a substantial degree of unreasonableness.

 

All I am trying to say is that many things in this world have been established as belief while lacking the support to make them what they claim to be, but are still considered as such because a general assumption has been made about them. I end this with another paragraph from the song:

 

There emerge

From those cardboard boxes

Washed-up people, obsolete

And sad and without any pluses

Desires that distress us

Are imposed on us

From the moment we are born they take us, come off it

For bloody idiots, whereas we are

 


Saturday, June 6, 2020

The numbers


Some years ago, I had a statistics class where our teacher used a very telling example:

'If I survey 3 dentists, and 2 of them recommend a specific toothpaste or dental hygiene tool, can I go ahead and make the statement: 2 out of 3 dentists recommend such a toothpaste?"

An argument consists of a conclusion that makes a claim of some sort and one or more premises intended to provide support for that conclusion. There are 2 different ways such support can be offered, depending on whether the premises aim at guaranteeing the truth of the conclusion or at simply providing some reasons for it. We can say that a conclusive relation between certain premises and a claim is a mark of a deductive argument, and a nonconclusive relation to that of an inductive argument. All arguments exemplify either one or the other of these two relations.

Why do I mention the above?

Let's talk about "black on black crimes" for a minute. I was inspired by a recent thread on Twitter by Michael Harriot, a senior writer at The Roots. I wanted to dive in what he says and write my own version of it with my own calculations.

As a numbers person myself, I always remember that a lot of arguments rest on fallacies. Such as in our above example where a hasty generalization affects the enumerative induction that 67% of dentists will recommend a specific toothpaste while only 3 have been interviewed. See where I'm going? A representative number of dentists was not observed to draw this conclusion. This is a mistake of trying to draw a conclusion about all things of a certain kind having a certain feature on the basis of one having it, or a sample that is neither comprehensive nor randomly selected like a serious study will.

Let's get back to the numbers. By looking at the FBI website, we can find data about arrests, do remember that crimes were committed by the same person (room for duplication). We can use an assumption here, let's say that each crime (murder) was committed by a different black person. The results show 53% (5,025) were committed by black or African American.



The latest census tells us that there are 47 million black people in the US. Following the assumption we made earlier that each crime was committed by a different person, that means a ratio of 5025/47 million will yield that 99.989497% of black people not committing murders. By the same math, that also suggests that 99.994923% of white people did not commit murder.

The black population represents more or less 13% of the total US population, using the actual numbers it means 0.10% of black people committed murders and 0.005% of white did the same. In other words, as Michael Harriot beautifully stated:" I will need to meet 10,000 different people before I meet a murderer". We can do the same calculations using all the other crimes, but I think my point is becoming clearer here. The robustness of methodology provides more reliable statistics that can be use in arguments. This argument about: "there are more black on black" crimes is basically not what it seems to be.

Let's dive into another aspect, we know that generally without context and history, it is easy to use statistical syllogism. This is basically an inductive argument whereby a certain feature is ascribed to some case or cases on the basis of their being subsumed within a larger class of things, some of which, sometimes many, have the ascribed feature. In our example, we see that the underneath calculation yielded a different result than what is generally heard.

We know that crimes have a context, any crime has some kind of sociological aspect associated with it. We know that sociologists describe crime as a whole as being an economic phenomenon so this suggests that the people with less will commit more crime, in other words people who are poor are more likely to commit crime. We will dive in this reality in another post as it is a little more complicated than this even though we know there is a correlation between crimes and inequality in society.

So to come back to that anecdote from the beginning, we see that we can make the numbers tell any story if we do not have to prove anything. The definition of statistics includes "large quantities" when we want to make inferences and this matters when anyone wants to use "stats" to justify a point or an argument. Always look for the underlying truth in anything that uses numbers, the same statistics could tell a different story

Until next time.

Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments below!

Oscar the talkative Platypus.

The rant

  We are in December, almost a year since the pandemic has started and many lives affected. Something that has not been different from last ...